The United States is fast becoming a third world country.
With Trump leading the charge from the oval office, paid-off leaders in Congress getting fat from deals working against most Americans, and an out of control Federal Reserve pushing inflation and moreover, in recent years, have engaged in the most egregious unlawful upward manipulation of the stock market thereby widening the wealth divide and pushing inflation into other areas of the economy, particularly housing, and from their manipulation, all those positioned far on the correct side of fair value for this masked economic depression have been unjustly forced to lose big. Because of the Federal Reserve hijacking bank interest back in 2009, the mindful who know how terrible the economy is and knowing stock valuations to be extraordinarily too high, there was solid basis to then short sell the bloated market. Not everyone buys into the lying propaganda of an improving economy and simultaneously are ignorant of stock valuations but apparently, the Federal Reserve and our governmental leaders relied on an ignorant public. Nonetheless, the mindful, those whom are financially responsible to know metrics of the economy and stock market should not be unjustly forced to lose. Some people lost 80% of their wealth as a result and though this represents a small percentage of the population, they should not be overlooked.
Now, for some broad measures of the economy, some of which are record setting on a negative aspect:
Wealth divide, record!
Homelessness, record!
Rents paid, record!
$5 Trillion lost in hijacked bank interest since 2008 that could otherwise be used to prop up the economy. The Federal Reserve thinks taking money away from the middle class, giving it to the wealthy is more effective. It's preposterous!
Unemployment, 26% and worsening, no matter the propaganda of a 4% unemployment rate. Nearly 100 million people are purposely left out of the data and part-time workers are counted the same as full-time workers, doesn't matter the quality of the job nor if getting health benefits. Others have dug into the BLS raw data and came up with essentially what I have. The typical range you may encounter is 23 to 26 percent.
GDP growth, record 10 years in a row deeply negative putting us at the worst depression in this nation's history. Our government lies in saying it has been positive since 2008. I estimate the real GDP growth presently to be at around negative 7%. this figure may look alarming and it is. It shouldn't be discounted automatically because of the propaganda being so intense suggesting it's much different. I challenge all those who have been so brainwashed with the official government figures to simply look at the nominal GDP growth rate, subtract out a reasonable inflation rate, not the contrived rate our government and Federal Reserve claims it is by looking at http://shadowstats.com and then also subtract out the percentage of the GDP due to deficit spending. Deficit spending does matter, particularly when on the order of 5 to 10 percent of the GDP. When deficit spending is so high, if the economy truly was doing well, we would be having extraordinarily high nominal GDP growth rates but the fact is, we do not. Pardon me for not using the html language for easy clicking, to help those see why the real GDP growth is so terrible, go view my 2012 article "https://seekingalpha.com/article/1001001-the-negative-10-percent-gdp-growth-unmasked". The "why" is in showing how the economic figures when properly put together shows the actual real GDP growth. The "why" in the sense of why it's so bad has to do much with the widening wealth divide where the wealthy do not have to spend as large of a percent of their income like those whom are poor or in the shrinking middle class, money flowing out of the country as in the trade imbalance, accounting games of large corporations ans wealthy individuals, from the hardship of a high cost of living in addition to other social problems I won't go into here causing many American citizens to live abroad, the massive amount of money given as "aid" even to wealthy nations like Israel that is separate from money taken from US citizens and given to the IMF (International Monetary fund), our massive military abroad where service persons spend their money abroad and our government leasing military bases all around the world, and then there's the inflammatory contention that our income tax goes to the Bank of England and on to the Vatican but without having good evidence of this, you could call this "conspiratorial" or perhaps some of you know about this and you can share with me.
Retail sales growth, record 10 years in a row deeply negative. Just as our lying government pushes the lie of positive retail sales growth, it's from not properly accounting for inflation and wholly disregarding the impact of deficit spending. for retail sales growth figures on a real basis, take the nominal rate, subtract out the actual rate of inflation, and subtract out 2/3 of the percentage of the GDP due to deficit spending. You would see the retail sales growth over the past years fluctuate somewhere around negative 10 to negative 5 percent.
Life in United States for the common person: Food far too expensive. Health care far too expensive. College far to expensive. Travel (hotels in particular) far too expensive. Car insurance far to expensive. Vehicle cost far to expensive. Housing costs far to expensive. People are struggling. Surely we have more in this country than many do in third world countries, but after all the necessary expenses to survive in the United states, there is not much left over to save for the most part. We have many tens of millions of people with less than $1,000 in savings. Of course some of this is from being loose with finances, though the availability of easy credit here has helped push the non-diligent into debt and/or to have little savings. Had wages kept up with inflation in other areas such as housing expenses, cable TV expense, health care expense, food expense, and so on, surely a bulk of people in this country wouldn't be hurting as they are presently. Going forward with more destructive wealth dividing policies will accelerate the problems faced by most in this country.
For the wealthy life has never been so good. The Federal Reserve accumulated trillions in debt to put the nation onto the hook for and the wealthy have been given free money due to the unlawful upward manipulation of the stock market. The Federal Reserve didn't care about the many corporations having negative earnings that would have disappeared off stock exchanges - they kept throwing money at them so bad companies stay solvent, the executives got wealthier, and shareholders get wealthier. Rightful short sellers were unjustly trampled upon by the egregious corruption of capital markets.
Here's the break-down who benefited from the Federal Reserve's ANTI-STIMULUS from 2009 to 2016:
It's not a stimulus if the wealthy gain at the detriment of everyone else! Nothing better happened from 2016 to 2018 - the wealthy gained huge from the extreme upward manipulation of the stock market since Trump got elected. The Federal Reserve keeps delaying reducing their balance sheet in purposely wanting to destroy this country.
Trade deficit: $600B annually. This is not a record high but getting close to it. It was worse in 2005 to 2008, presumably from a better feeling about the economy to spend more. Since in real terms our consumer spending has been going lower as terrible policies in our government and from the Federal Reserve diverting the wealth from the poor and middle class to the wealthy, the wealthy simply do not have to spend a high percentage of their income like the non-wealthy have to and this hurts economic growth and which shows in the declining spending by US consumers. Sure, with inflation our government misleads the public in saying spending is up but they do not factor in a reasonable inflation rate and wholly dismisses deficit spending. Had our spending increased on a real basis and only with respect to population growth, the trade deficit would likely be at a record high. Our worsening economy that our government and Federal Reserve lies about curbed the trade deficit. This does not necessarily mean it's good, for one must consider the math involved. for a quick example using fictitious figures, suppose US exports and imports were, respectively, $1T, $2T, and then later, were, $800B, $1.7T. This would show less economic activity in international trade and would point to, but still not necessarily, a worsening economy. One would have to look at internal figures for making added conclusions. Still, being the trade deficit is not at record highs presently, the worsening state of the US economy plays a role in this. It would hardly likely be the case of an inverse relationship as when the economy worsens, a greater percentage of income has to be used on necessities such as food and invariably, much of that would be from domestic sources.
Food stamp recipients, off from record highs but that's not from a lack of need, it's from government putting the clamp on those who need help. For a program costing around $80 billion annually, there's so much hoopla about the cost of the social program yet there's no complaint giving billions of dollars to Israel annually and probably over a trillion dollars has been given to Israel over the years. What's the better use of money? I show on http://proposedsolutions.blogspot.com we could be saving well over $1 Trillion per year getting rid of a small amount of the under-worked, overpaid, bad attitude government employees and paying the remainder at a fair rate of 15% below that of the private sector. Now, what's a few billion in saving with modest cuts in the food stamp program versus over a trillion in savings to the american taxpayer by getting the excessively high salaries down of our public servants? It's preposterous when the SERVANTS get paid more than their masters! Some like to look back at the long soup lines of the 1930's and say it's not as bad today as back then. well, that's unfair comparison. We still do have soup kitchens all across this country, free food pantries that are swamped with increasing numbers seeking assistance and the food stamp program keeps the poverty atrocity hidden from public view.
Federal Reserve: TOTALLY OUT OF CONTROL.
The Fed is mandated to provide stable pricing. Making extraordinarily high prices is not their mandate. They could have even stabilized the stock market to the lofty levels of year 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, and early 2016 (back when the market was going nicely down in the direction of fair value for this masked economic depression but the Fed intervened not just to stabilize, they put their foot on the pedal and manipulated it up - I saw what was going on and I held in thinking it's preposterous they would continue to the extent they were doing and then came the Brexit vote, market started to fall and was saved so quickly with big manipulation to follow-through and that's not stabilizing, it's different). The Fed corrupted the markets. The many corporations with negative earnings, particularly small cap stocks, got infused with money to keep faulty operations going, the executives of which got richer, shareholders (not investors when valuations are insanely too high) got richer, those on the correct side of fair value unjustly forced to lose. I never got the memo that the Fed intended not just to stabilize markets but to totally corrupt them, would mow over anyone who knows how to trade effectively even being able to gain going against the market as I have demonstrated as the manipulation would be several times greater than could be overcome by diligent trading techniques while maintaining a position on the correct side of fair value in the market as not only would they make the markets go against fair value, they would also remove much of the normal fluctuations of the market. Imagine, had I the where with all, I could have started a small cap company, do nothing, and the money would be coming to me because of the Federal Reserve. That's nonsense. considering the hijacking of bank interest down to about ZERO in 2009, people were compelled to find other places to put their money. The typical person may mindlessly go long the market, not caring about valuations, not questioning the lies of an improving economy, and from their ignorance, got free money off everyone else. The mindful who knew stock valuations to be on the order of 50% too high late in 2009, to 100% too high by 2012, 300% too high by 2016 and to around 400% too high in January 2018 (all analytically assessed per historical measures for an economy in the toilet - I remind you of the actual real GDP growth being deeply negative and in bad times we should be experiencing PE ratios at the low end, not at record highs as we have now), put their money far on the correct side of fair value and got crushed unjustly. If I get another life, I'll make certain to bang my head against a wall to lower my IQ 80 or so points to be among the average person and then from ignorance I could be gaining in life - it's incredible how illogical the markets are today and despite the adage that markets are not logical, they've always had some sense and reversion to the mean but the manipulation by the Federal Reserve in the past 9 years has added so much nonsense, there really is no longer a market but an overly rigged game.
There are solutions. I made a site over 7 years ago showing what must be done in focusing attention at the underlying problems. I wrote dozens of US Senators, countless US Representatives, the president, the Federal Reserve, but apparently when you are considered a nobody, you get no attention unless you have massive numbers siding with you. Words should be taken on merit, not based on a faulty psychological notion dismissing those whom are not publicly recognized or absent of certain associations with reputable persons or organizations.
Personally, I've lived in quite a few decades and was paying attention to society and the economy even from the young age of 10, back when I was a full-time bookkeeper. I was assessing the cost of homes per income and eventually wrote an online site on this. Despite the apparent hard times of the 1970's it was far better a period than today. We didn't have so much illegal aliens putting their pressure on society. Typical families had a man working and being able to support an entire family while the wife could stay home being a homemaker (don't interject feminism concepts here- this is merely a characterization of the past showing one wage earner in a family was sufficient in obtaining the American dream of owning a home, having children, and having some sense of happiness. Today, a third of adults still live with their parents because life has become increasingly harsh. A huge percent of people are not married or will never be married as a result of financial problems which is reflective of a problematic economy (besides non-economical issues which also play a big role but I want to avoid discussing the social implications here). This also points, despite the many who have children out of wed-lock, a large percent of the population will die and never have children. In just a few decades time' life has degenerated greatly. There wasn't the greed present back then. CEOs had incomes of of far fewer average workers compared to today. There wasn't so much an emphasis to buy homes to turn into rentals to make extra money at the detriment of others and for which helps fuel home prices to soar, leaving out any in life and not everyone would be able to gain from this happening as a ponzi scheme cannot accommodate all in equal fashion. The minimum wage was $2.35 for some time and this was not a big issue to many when the cost of housing was at a far lower ratio to income as it is today. That ratio is about double today than just 40 years ago and this is troubling. Why is it we do not have leaders pushing for reforms properly addressing the issue. making the minimum wage higher feeds into the inflation game, leaving out those on fixed income who do not get the same proportionate increase, hurts the poor even more when out of work as they'd be experiencing greater inflation, the poor in general would be hurt as the wealthy, not liking their dining expenses going up, could turn around and jack up the rents on the disadvantaged. Then what would be needed, raising the minimum wage more? the obvious solution is to get home expenses lower. I show how it can be accomplished. It pains me to think once some non-solution like raising the minimum wage enters the popular discussion, it then becomes a matter of to do it or not to do it, absent of coming up with a real solution. Apparently our overpaid school teachers are not showing students how to think critically.
With Trump leading the charge from the oval office, paid-off leaders in Congress getting fat from deals working against most Americans, and an out of control Federal Reserve pushing inflation and moreover, in recent years, have engaged in the most egregious unlawful upward manipulation of the stock market thereby widening the wealth divide and pushing inflation into other areas of the economy, particularly housing, and from their manipulation, all those positioned far on the correct side of fair value for this masked economic depression have been unjustly forced to lose big. Because of the Federal Reserve hijacking bank interest back in 2009, the mindful who know how terrible the economy is and knowing stock valuations to be extraordinarily too high, there was solid basis to then short sell the bloated market. Not everyone buys into the lying propaganda of an improving economy and simultaneously are ignorant of stock valuations but apparently, the Federal Reserve and our governmental leaders relied on an ignorant public. Nonetheless, the mindful, those whom are financially responsible to know metrics of the economy and stock market should not be unjustly forced to lose. Some people lost 80% of their wealth as a result and though this represents a small percentage of the population, they should not be overlooked.
Now, for some broad measures of the economy, some of which are record setting on a negative aspect:
Wealth divide, record!
Homelessness, record!
Rents paid, record!
$5 Trillion lost in hijacked bank interest since 2008 that could otherwise be used to prop up the economy. The Federal Reserve thinks taking money away from the middle class, giving it to the wealthy is more effective. It's preposterous!
Unemployment, 26% and worsening, no matter the propaganda of a 4% unemployment rate. Nearly 100 million people are purposely left out of the data and part-time workers are counted the same as full-time workers, doesn't matter the quality of the job nor if getting health benefits. Others have dug into the BLS raw data and came up with essentially what I have. The typical range you may encounter is 23 to 26 percent.
GDP growth, record 10 years in a row deeply negative putting us at the worst depression in this nation's history. Our government lies in saying it has been positive since 2008. I estimate the real GDP growth presently to be at around negative 7%. this figure may look alarming and it is. It shouldn't be discounted automatically because of the propaganda being so intense suggesting it's much different. I challenge all those who have been so brainwashed with the official government figures to simply look at the nominal GDP growth rate, subtract out a reasonable inflation rate, not the contrived rate our government and Federal Reserve claims it is by looking at http://shadowstats.com and then also subtract out the percentage of the GDP due to deficit spending. Deficit spending does matter, particularly when on the order of 5 to 10 percent of the GDP. When deficit spending is so high, if the economy truly was doing well, we would be having extraordinarily high nominal GDP growth rates but the fact is, we do not. Pardon me for not using the html language for easy clicking, to help those see why the real GDP growth is so terrible, go view my 2012 article "https://seekingalpha.com/article/1001001-the-negative-10-percent-gdp-growth-unmasked". The "why" is in showing how the economic figures when properly put together shows the actual real GDP growth. The "why" in the sense of why it's so bad has to do much with the widening wealth divide where the wealthy do not have to spend as large of a percent of their income like those whom are poor or in the shrinking middle class, money flowing out of the country as in the trade imbalance, accounting games of large corporations ans wealthy individuals, from the hardship of a high cost of living in addition to other social problems I won't go into here causing many American citizens to live abroad, the massive amount of money given as "aid" even to wealthy nations like Israel that is separate from money taken from US citizens and given to the IMF (International Monetary fund), our massive military abroad where service persons spend their money abroad and our government leasing military bases all around the world, and then there's the inflammatory contention that our income tax goes to the Bank of England and on to the Vatican but without having good evidence of this, you could call this "conspiratorial" or perhaps some of you know about this and you can share with me.
Retail sales growth, record 10 years in a row deeply negative. Just as our lying government pushes the lie of positive retail sales growth, it's from not properly accounting for inflation and wholly disregarding the impact of deficit spending. for retail sales growth figures on a real basis, take the nominal rate, subtract out the actual rate of inflation, and subtract out 2/3 of the percentage of the GDP due to deficit spending. You would see the retail sales growth over the past years fluctuate somewhere around negative 10 to negative 5 percent.
Life in United States for the common person: Food far too expensive. Health care far too expensive. College far to expensive. Travel (hotels in particular) far too expensive. Car insurance far to expensive. Vehicle cost far to expensive. Housing costs far to expensive. People are struggling. Surely we have more in this country than many do in third world countries, but after all the necessary expenses to survive in the United states, there is not much left over to save for the most part. We have many tens of millions of people with less than $1,000 in savings. Of course some of this is from being loose with finances, though the availability of easy credit here has helped push the non-diligent into debt and/or to have little savings. Had wages kept up with inflation in other areas such as housing expenses, cable TV expense, health care expense, food expense, and so on, surely a bulk of people in this country wouldn't be hurting as they are presently. Going forward with more destructive wealth dividing policies will accelerate the problems faced by most in this country.
For the wealthy life has never been so good. The Federal Reserve accumulated trillions in debt to put the nation onto the hook for and the wealthy have been given free money due to the unlawful upward manipulation of the stock market. The Federal Reserve didn't care about the many corporations having negative earnings that would have disappeared off stock exchanges - they kept throwing money at them so bad companies stay solvent, the executives got wealthier, and shareholders get wealthier. Rightful short sellers were unjustly trampled upon by the egregious corruption of capital markets.
Here's the break-down who benefited from the Federal Reserve's ANTI-STIMULUS from 2009 to 2016:
It's not a stimulus if the wealthy gain at the detriment of everyone else! Nothing better happened from 2016 to 2018 - the wealthy gained huge from the extreme upward manipulation of the stock market since Trump got elected. The Federal Reserve keeps delaying reducing their balance sheet in purposely wanting to destroy this country.
Trade deficit: $600B annually. This is not a record high but getting close to it. It was worse in 2005 to 2008, presumably from a better feeling about the economy to spend more. Since in real terms our consumer spending has been going lower as terrible policies in our government and from the Federal Reserve diverting the wealth from the poor and middle class to the wealthy, the wealthy simply do not have to spend a high percentage of their income like the non-wealthy have to and this hurts economic growth and which shows in the declining spending by US consumers. Sure, with inflation our government misleads the public in saying spending is up but they do not factor in a reasonable inflation rate and wholly dismisses deficit spending. Had our spending increased on a real basis and only with respect to population growth, the trade deficit would likely be at a record high. Our worsening economy that our government and Federal Reserve lies about curbed the trade deficit. This does not necessarily mean it's good, for one must consider the math involved. for a quick example using fictitious figures, suppose US exports and imports were, respectively, $1T, $2T, and then later, were, $800B, $1.7T. This would show less economic activity in international trade and would point to, but still not necessarily, a worsening economy. One would have to look at internal figures for making added conclusions. Still, being the trade deficit is not at record highs presently, the worsening state of the US economy plays a role in this. It would hardly likely be the case of an inverse relationship as when the economy worsens, a greater percentage of income has to be used on necessities such as food and invariably, much of that would be from domestic sources.
Food stamp recipients, off from record highs but that's not from a lack of need, it's from government putting the clamp on those who need help. For a program costing around $80 billion annually, there's so much hoopla about the cost of the social program yet there's no complaint giving billions of dollars to Israel annually and probably over a trillion dollars has been given to Israel over the years. What's the better use of money? I show on http://proposedsolutions.blogspot.com we could be saving well over $1 Trillion per year getting rid of a small amount of the under-worked, overpaid, bad attitude government employees and paying the remainder at a fair rate of 15% below that of the private sector. Now, what's a few billion in saving with modest cuts in the food stamp program versus over a trillion in savings to the american taxpayer by getting the excessively high salaries down of our public servants? It's preposterous when the SERVANTS get paid more than their masters! Some like to look back at the long soup lines of the 1930's and say it's not as bad today as back then. well, that's unfair comparison. We still do have soup kitchens all across this country, free food pantries that are swamped with increasing numbers seeking assistance and the food stamp program keeps the poverty atrocity hidden from public view.
Federal Reserve: TOTALLY OUT OF CONTROL.
The Fed is mandated to provide stable pricing. Making extraordinarily high prices is not their mandate. They could have even stabilized the stock market to the lofty levels of year 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, and early 2016 (back when the market was going nicely down in the direction of fair value for this masked economic depression but the Fed intervened not just to stabilize, they put their foot on the pedal and manipulated it up - I saw what was going on and I held in thinking it's preposterous they would continue to the extent they were doing and then came the Brexit vote, market started to fall and was saved so quickly with big manipulation to follow-through and that's not stabilizing, it's different). The Fed corrupted the markets. The many corporations with negative earnings, particularly small cap stocks, got infused with money to keep faulty operations going, the executives of which got richer, shareholders (not investors when valuations are insanely too high) got richer, those on the correct side of fair value unjustly forced to lose. I never got the memo that the Fed intended not just to stabilize markets but to totally corrupt them, would mow over anyone who knows how to trade effectively even being able to gain going against the market as I have demonstrated as the manipulation would be several times greater than could be overcome by diligent trading techniques while maintaining a position on the correct side of fair value in the market as not only would they make the markets go against fair value, they would also remove much of the normal fluctuations of the market. Imagine, had I the where with all, I could have started a small cap company, do nothing, and the money would be coming to me because of the Federal Reserve. That's nonsense. considering the hijacking of bank interest down to about ZERO in 2009, people were compelled to find other places to put their money. The typical person may mindlessly go long the market, not caring about valuations, not questioning the lies of an improving economy, and from their ignorance, got free money off everyone else. The mindful who knew stock valuations to be on the order of 50% too high late in 2009, to 100% too high by 2012, 300% too high by 2016 and to around 400% too high in January 2018 (all analytically assessed per historical measures for an economy in the toilet - I remind you of the actual real GDP growth being deeply negative and in bad times we should be experiencing PE ratios at the low end, not at record highs as we have now), put their money far on the correct side of fair value and got crushed unjustly. If I get another life, I'll make certain to bang my head against a wall to lower my IQ 80 or so points to be among the average person and then from ignorance I could be gaining in life - it's incredible how illogical the markets are today and despite the adage that markets are not logical, they've always had some sense and reversion to the mean but the manipulation by the Federal Reserve in the past 9 years has added so much nonsense, there really is no longer a market but an overly rigged game.
There are solutions. I made a site over 7 years ago showing what must be done in focusing attention at the underlying problems. I wrote dozens of US Senators, countless US Representatives, the president, the Federal Reserve, but apparently when you are considered a nobody, you get no attention unless you have massive numbers siding with you. Words should be taken on merit, not based on a faulty psychological notion dismissing those whom are not publicly recognized or absent of certain associations with reputable persons or organizations.
Personally, I've lived in quite a few decades and was paying attention to society and the economy even from the young age of 10, back when I was a full-time bookkeeper. I was assessing the cost of homes per income and eventually wrote an online site on this. Despite the apparent hard times of the 1970's it was far better a period than today. We didn't have so much illegal aliens putting their pressure on society. Typical families had a man working and being able to support an entire family while the wife could stay home being a homemaker (don't interject feminism concepts here- this is merely a characterization of the past showing one wage earner in a family was sufficient in obtaining the American dream of owning a home, having children, and having some sense of happiness. Today, a third of adults still live with their parents because life has become increasingly harsh. A huge percent of people are not married or will never be married as a result of financial problems which is reflective of a problematic economy (besides non-economical issues which also play a big role but I want to avoid discussing the social implications here). This also points, despite the many who have children out of wed-lock, a large percent of the population will die and never have children. In just a few decades time' life has degenerated greatly. There wasn't the greed present back then. CEOs had incomes of of far fewer average workers compared to today. There wasn't so much an emphasis to buy homes to turn into rentals to make extra money at the detriment of others and for which helps fuel home prices to soar, leaving out any in life and not everyone would be able to gain from this happening as a ponzi scheme cannot accommodate all in equal fashion. The minimum wage was $2.35 for some time and this was not a big issue to many when the cost of housing was at a far lower ratio to income as it is today. That ratio is about double today than just 40 years ago and this is troubling. Why is it we do not have leaders pushing for reforms properly addressing the issue. making the minimum wage higher feeds into the inflation game, leaving out those on fixed income who do not get the same proportionate increase, hurts the poor even more when out of work as they'd be experiencing greater inflation, the poor in general would be hurt as the wealthy, not liking their dining expenses going up, could turn around and jack up the rents on the disadvantaged. Then what would be needed, raising the minimum wage more? the obvious solution is to get home expenses lower. I show how it can be accomplished. It pains me to think once some non-solution like raising the minimum wage enters the popular discussion, it then becomes a matter of to do it or not to do it, absent of coming up with a real solution. Apparently our overpaid school teachers are not showing students how to think critically.
Comments
Post a Comment